For years, people have talked about collecting old IRC logs in one large, searchable database. Not just a few selected conversations or whatever happened to survive on one person’s hard drive, but extensive archives from selected channels across several IRC networks. Conversations, arguments, technical discussions, friendships, complete nonsense and everything else people wrote before social media swallowed most of the internet.
That project now exists.
The available log files date back to the late 1990s, with some material going as far back as 1996. Not all of it has been imported yet, and some of it may never be. Parts of the archive are incomplete, damaged or stored in formats of such poor quality that reliable import may simply not be possible. Even so, some of these files have been sitting on old disks and forgotten storage for around 30 years.
A great deal of it has probably not been read since it was originally written.
That is precisely what makes the material interesting. It is a largely unedited record of how people communicated online before Facebook, Discord, Reddit and the rest of the modern platform circus. People were often less careful, more spontaneous and considerably less aware that something they wrote might still be searchable several decades later.
And that can also be a problem.
“I don’t think they should be public”
During a discussion about the project, a channel member raised a fairly simple objection: “No, but I don’t think they should be publicly available.”
That comment describes the uncomfortable part of building an archive like this.
People have wanted the old logs preserved. People have asked when the archive would become available for many years now. People want to search for old friends and conversations they barely remember. Then the archive finally starts becoming publicly accessible, and the first reasonable reaction is that perhaps it should immediately be hidden again.
That does not make the concern invalid. An IRC nickname may not look like personal information in isolation. Once it appears repeatedly across several channels, years and networks, it can become surprisingly easy to connect that nickname to a real person. Old logs may also contain things people wrote as teenagers, during arguments, while drunk, while angry or simply before they had developed anything resembling judgement. Thirty years is a long time.
Removing everything is not a serious solution
The archive loses most of its purpose if every privacy request results in entire conversations being deleted. An IRC conversation rarely belongs to one person. Removing every line surrounding a nickname would also remove replies, context and material written by everyone else in the channel. The current idea is therefore to introduce a privacy-request system with several different levels of protection.
A normal privacy request would primarily prevent selected entries from appearing in search-engine results. The same entries could also be hidden from visitors who are not logged in. Authenticated users could still see the original archive. The filtering would be handled by the API rather than only by the website. This matters because the archive may eventually have several different clients. A React interface, a simplified web interface or another application should all receive the same filtered result from the server.
Privacy rules should not disappear merely because someone builds a new frontend. There must also be a stronger form of removal for exceptional cases. Certain entries may need to remain hidden even from authenticated users. That would function more like an actual deletion, although the exact implementation still needs to be worked out.
We’re still working on this matter.
Nicknames are another bloody problem
A privacy system based entirely on exact nickname matching would be nearly useless. Someone known as “TMM” might also have used “TMM-TT”, “TMM-T2000”, “TMM” or another variation after reconnecting, changing networks or having their original nickname stolen. The system therefore needs a way to connect several nicknames to the same privacy identity.
That cannot simply be guessed automatically. Similar nicknames do not always belong to the same person, and different nicknames sometimes do. Without some kind of verified nickname mapping, a privacy request could hide only a fraction of a person’s history while leaving the rest fully searchable.
An archive with safeguards
The purpose of the project is still to preserve IRC history and make it accessible.
Hiding the entire archive behind closed doors would make it far less useful. Publishing everything without controls would ignore the fact that the people inside the logs are real people, many of whom wrote those lines decades before anyone expected them to become part of a public historical database.
The archive therefore needs safeguards built into the system itself:
- Privacy requests connected to verified nicknames and aliases.
- Search-engine restrictions for protected entries.
- Different visibility rules for guests and authenticated users.
- API-level filtering shared by every client.
- Stronger removal options for exceptional material.
- Clear information explaining what is stored and how a request can be made.
- A possibility to anonymize nicknames, for example by hashing certain names.
The privacy-request system has been designed, although it has not yet been completely implemented, and anonymisation measures are also being added. The IRC logs project is finally here. Now comes the slightly awkward task of making the archive public without immediately giving everyone a bloody good reason to demand that it disappears again.
IRC Memory Lane
It is react based and works with Tornevall Networks ToolsAPI: https://tools.tornevall.net/docs/irclog-api-guide










